Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Organic Geochemistryarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Organic Geochemistry
Article . 2011 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Organic Geochemistry
Article . 2011
Data sources: u:cris
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

Archaeal lipids in Neogene dolomites (Monterey and Sisquoc Formations, California) – Planktic versus benthic archaeal sources

Authors: Hoffmann-Sell, L.; Birgel, D.; Arning, E.; Föllmi, K.; Peckmann, J.;

Archaeal lipids in Neogene dolomites (Monterey and Sisquoc Formations, California) – Planktic versus benthic archaeal sources

Abstract

Abstract The distribution of archaeal lipids, including archaeol and glycerol dibiphytanyl glycerol tetraethers (GDGTs), in dolomite concretions and surrounding sediment from the Monterey Formation (Miocene) and the Sisquoc Formation (Miocene–Pliocene) were examined to distinguish planktic from benthic contributions. For this purpose, dolomites with positive δ 13 C values (+7‰ to +13‰) were chosen; such highly positive values point to pronounced methanogenesis of benthic archaea in the sedimentary column. At first glance, distributions and relative abundances of GDGTs in both dolomites and background sediment were similar, resembling patterns of marine planktic crenarchaea. A contribution of benthic euryarchaea to the GDGT pool became evident only from variations in the δ 13 C values of different biphytanes obtained after ether cleavage of GDGTs. Whereas bi- and tricyclic biphytanes had an isotopic signal typical of planktic archaea (δ 13 C −23.6‰ to −20.5‰ and −23.4‰ to −21.2‰, respectively) for both dolomite and background sediment, acyclic and monocyclic biphytanes showed lower values for dolomite samples (−25.1‰ to −22.6‰ and −27.6‰ to −24.7‰, respectively), indicating a contribution of lipids from benthic archaea. The isoprenoid diether archaeol (δ 13 C −23.9‰ to −22.9‰), assigned to euryarchaea, was only detected in dolomite samples, also reflecting additional input from sedimentary archaea, probably autotrophic methanogens. The occurrence of lipids derived from methanogenic archaea agrees with the strong 13 C-enrichment of dolomites and with mineral formation taking place in the zone of archaeal methanogenesis. This implies that the lipid biomarker inventory of sedimentary strata needs to be interpreted carefully, as it is often not straightforward to discriminate between input from the water column and sedimentary microbial activity.

Countries
Germany, Austria
Keywords

105101 Allgemeine Geologie, 105121 Sedimentologie, 105105 Geochemistry, 105121 Sedimentology, 550 - Earth sciences, 105105 Geochemie, 105101 General geology

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    14
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
14
Top 10%
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!