Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Oral Surgery Oral Me...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology
Article . 2019 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF P16 PROTEIN EXPRESSION IN NORMAL AND DYSPLASTIC ORAL MUCOSAL EPITHELIUM

Authors: Dr. Vimi Mutalik; Dr. Kristin McNamara; Dr. John Draper; Dr. John Kalmar;

COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF P16 PROTEIN EXPRESSION IN NORMAL AND DYSPLASTIC ORAL MUCOSAL EPITHELIUM

Abstract

Objective Expression of the protein marker p 16INK4a is used as a surrogate for human papillomavirus (HPV) infection in biopsies of oral and tonsillar mucosa. While HPV infection accounts for Findings Fifteen of the 24 HGDs (62.5%), fourteen of the 24 LGDs (58.3%) and four of the 24 CMs (16.6%) were positive for p 16INK4a expression. The difference in p16 expression between HGD versus CM and LGD versus CM were analyzed by Wilcoxon signed rank test and statistically significantly different at level with p-values of 0.0001 and 0.0009, respectively. Greater p16 expression was noted in HGDs compared to LGDs (p-value = 0.01960, which was significant at level). A step-down Holm-Bonferroni method to account for multiple comparisons showed adjusted p-values of 0.0003 (HG versus CM), 0.0018 (LG versus CM) and 0.0196 (HG versus low LG) among three groups. Conclusion p16 expression was statistically-significantly greater in LGD and HGD lesions compared to CM, with a trend of greater expression being associated with higher grade of dysplasia.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
bronze