
pmid: 14980578
We argue that conjunction analysis does not solve the problems with subtraction analyses that it sets out to solve and that it has additional problems of its own. We argue that detailed analyses of the tasks set to identify cognitive functions are required for both conjunction and subtraction analyses to achieve their goals of localizing cognitive operations using functional neuroimaging techniques.
Brain Mapping, Brain, Verbal Learning, Image Enhancement, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Sensitivity and Specificity, Cognition, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Subtraction Technique, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Humans, Attention, Mathematical Computing
Brain Mapping, Brain, Verbal Learning, Image Enhancement, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Sensitivity and Specificity, Cognition, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Subtraction Technique, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Humans, Attention, Mathematical Computing
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 24 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
