
pmid: 16782233
To study CSF biomarkers, beta-amyloid(1-42) (Abeta(1-42)) and tau, and medial temporal lobe atrophy (MTA) on MRI in their ability to predict dementia in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI).Fifty-nine MCI patients (49% male, mean age 69+/-8), follow-up 19 months, were included. Baseline CSF levels of Abeta(1-42), tau and MTA-score were dichotomized.Thirty-three (56%) of the MCI patients progressed to dementia, 30 of which had Alzheimer's disease. Lower CSF Abeta(1-42) level, higher CSF-tau and higher MTA-scores at baseline were found in progressed patients. Cox proportional hazards models revealed that abnormal CSF Abeta(1-42), CSF tau and MTA were significantly associated with dementia at follow-up (hazard ratio (95% confidence interval): 4.0 (1.3-12.1), 5.9 (1.6-21.7) and 2.1 (1.0-4.6)). A fourfold higher risk was found for patients with both abnormal CSF biomarkers and MTA compared to patients with either test abnormal. Ninety-four percent of patients with both abnormalities converted to dementia.These findings suggest an added value of CSF to MRI in the diagnostic work up of patients presenting at a memory clinic.
Male, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Mild cognitive impairment, CSF, tau Proteins, Middle Aged, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Peptide Fragments, Temporal Lobe, Predictive Value of Tests, Disease Progression, Humans, Dementia, Female, Longitudinal Studies, Prospective Studies, Atrophy, Cognition Disorders, MRI, Aged
Male, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Mild cognitive impairment, CSF, tau Proteins, Middle Aged, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Peptide Fragments, Temporal Lobe, Predictive Value of Tests, Disease Progression, Humans, Dementia, Female, Longitudinal Studies, Prospective Studies, Atrophy, Cognition Disorders, MRI, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 160 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
