Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Neurocomputingarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Neurocomputing
Article
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: UnpayWall
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Neurocomputing
Article . 2016 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
DBLP
Article . 2018
Data sources: DBLP
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

Compass radius estimation for improved image classification using Edge-SIFT

Authors: Eduardo Fidalgo; Enrique Alegre; Víctor González-Castro; Laura Fernández-Robles;

Compass radius estimation for improved image classification using Edge-SIFT

Abstract

The combination of SIFT descriptors with other features usually improves image classification, like Edge-SIFT, which extracts keypoints from an edge image obtained after applying the compass operator to a colour image. We evaluate for the first time, how the use of different radii in the compass operator affects the classification performance. We demonstrate that the value proposed in the literature, radius=4.00, is not the optimum from an image classification point of view. We also put in evidence that in ideal conditions, choosing an appropriate radius for each image yields accuracy values even higher than 95%. Finally, we propose a new method to estimate the best radius for the compass operator in each dataset. Using a training subset selected on the basis of a minimum dispersion criterion of edges density, we construct a richer dictionary for each dataset in our Bag of Words pipeline. From that dictionary it is selected a radius for the whole dataset that yields higher accuracy than using the value proposed in the literature. Using this method, we obtained improvements in the accuracy up to 24.4% in Soccer, 6.77% in COIL-RWTH-2, 4.46% in Birds, 3.82% in ImageNet_Dogs, 2.75% in ImageNet_Birds, 2.02% in Flowers and 1.75% in Caltech101 datasets. It was demonstrated that compass radius in Edge-SIFT affects to classification.The classification performance of different radii was evaluated on eight datasets.It is shown that selecting a radius for each image results in better classification.A method to automatically estimate a better radius for each dataset is proposed.The estimated radius guarantees better results than the state-of-the-art.

Country
United Kingdom
Related Organizations
Keywords

Edge Compass Operator, dense SIFT, Support Vector Machine, Image Classification, Bag of Words, Radius estimation, Edge-SIFT

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    14
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
14
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Green
hybrid
Related to Research communities