
Many statistical models of coupling between time changes of the band-limited power of neural signals and functional magnetic resonance imaging Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent (BOLD) signal time changes rely on linear convolution. The effect of nonlinear behaviors in single-trial relationships between neural signals and BOLD responses is rarely tested and included in models. Here we investigate whether using a static nonlinearity improves the prediction of single-trial BOLD responses from neural signals. A static nonlinearity is a nonlinear transformation of the convolution of neural responses which is implemented by the same nonlinear function for all time points. We evaluated this approach by applying it to simultaneous recordings of functional magnetic resonance imaging BOLD and band-limited neural signals (Local Field Potentials and Multi Unit Activity) from primary visual cortex of anaesthetized macaques. We found that using a simple polynomial static nonlinearity was sufficient to obtain highly significant improvements of the accuracy of single-trial BOLD prediction over the accuracy obtained with linear convolution. This suggests that static nonlinearities may be a useful tool for a compact and accurate statistical description of neurovascular coupling.
Local field potential, Models, Neurological, Static nonlinearities, Macaca mulatta, Oxygen, Nonlinear Dynamics, FMRI, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Visual Perception, Animals, Evoked Potentials, Visual, Computer Simulation, Neurovascular coupling, BOLD, Visual Cortex
Local field potential, Models, Neurological, Static nonlinearities, Macaca mulatta, Oxygen, Nonlinear Dynamics, FMRI, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Visual Perception, Animals, Evoked Potentials, Visual, Computer Simulation, Neurovascular coupling, BOLD, Visual Cortex
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 16 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
