
Abstract The different ways in which diagnoses may be categorized in EQA schemes are considered. They may be grouped in very large diagnostic categories, or in narrow specific diagnoses. They may be categorized as dangerous or non-dangerous diagnoses. They may be categorized by the participants or a panel of experts. They may be categorized according to organ system, but rarely by underlying pathological process. The ways in which these categories are reached is considered, and the effect this has on the educational role of EQA schemes. This categorization will also influence the participant's strategy to ensure that they are not categorized as a poor performer.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
