
pmid: 27040524
The tensions of uncertainty: midwives managing risk in and of their practice. There has been a fundamental shift in past decades in the way midwifery is enacted. The midwifery attributes of skilful practice and conscious alertness seem to have been replaced by the concept of risk with its connotations of control, surveillance and blame. How midwifery manages practice in this risk framework is of concern. Taking a critical realist approach this paper reports on a theoretically and empirically derived model of midwifery undertaken with New Zealand midwives. The model is a three legged birth stool for the midwife which describes how she makes sense of risk in practice. The seat of the stool is being with women and the legs are 'being a professional', 'working the system' and 'working with complexity'. The struts which hold the stool together are 'story telling'. Risk theory is reviewed in light of the empirical study and a theoretical gap of uncertainty and complexity are identified.
Risk Management, Attitude of Health Personnel, Interprofessional Relations, Uncertainty, Professional-Patient Relations, Empirical Research, Models, Theoretical, Midwifery, Interviews as Topic, Pregnancy, Metaphor, Humans, Female, Professional Autonomy, New Zealand
Risk Management, Attitude of Health Personnel, Interprofessional Relations, Uncertainty, Professional-Patient Relations, Empirical Research, Models, Theoretical, Midwifery, Interviews as Topic, Pregnancy, Metaphor, Humans, Female, Professional Autonomy, New Zealand
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 14 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
