Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Revista Mexicana de ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Revista Mexicana de Oftalmología
Article . 2015 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Revista Mexicana de Oftalmología
Article
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: UnpayWall
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Revista Mexicana de Oftalmología
Article . 2015
License: CC BY NC ND
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Revista Mexicana de Oftalmología
Article . 2015
Data sources: DOAJ
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

Uso de adhesivo tisular de fibrina en queratoplastia penetrante

Authors: Israel Luna Martínez; Gustavo Aguilar Montes;

Uso de adhesivo tisular de fibrina en queratoplastia penetrante

Abstract

ResumenObjetivoDeterminar la eficacia y seguridad del uso de adhesivo tisular de fibrina en la queratoplastia penetrante (QPP) comparándola con la técnica estándar.Material y métodosSe captaron pacientes candidatos a QPP dividiéndolos aleatoriamente en 2 grupos de 10; al primero se le realizó QPP con 8 puntos simples de nailon 10-0, aplicando adhesivo tisular en la herida quirúrgica, y al segundo se le aplicó la técnica estándar usando 16 puntos simples, registrando el tiempo quirúrgico de cada procedimiento. Se midió agudeza visual mejor corregida y astigmatismo queratométrico a los 3 y 6 meses postoperatorios.ResultadosEl tiempo quirúrgico promedio para el grupo de adhesivo fue 36.1min vs. 55.1 min en el grupo control (p=<0.0001). El astigmatismo queratométrico promedio a los 3m fue −3.69 D para el grupo de adhesivo vs. −4.75D en el grupo de QPP estándar (p=0.245) y −2.88D vs. −3.44D a los 6m (p=0.246). La agudeza visual mejor corregida promedio fue LogMAR 0.37 para el grupo de adhesivo vs. LogMAR 0.39 (p=0.822) a los 3m y LogMAR 0.20 vs. LogMAR 0.25 a los 6m, respectivamente (p=0.334). Ningún paciente presentó complicaciones relacionadas con el procedimiento quirúrgico.ConclusionesLa QPP con 8 puntos simples y adhesivo tisular parece ser una técnica segura, que requiere menor tiempo quirúrgico y que permite al paciente una recuperación visual más rápida comparada con la técnica estándar.AbstractObjectiveTo determine safety and efficacy of the use of fibrin glue in penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) compared with the standard technique.Material and methodsCandidates to PKP were captured, dividing them in 2 groups of 10 patients each; in the first group, PKP using 8 nylon 10-0 sutures and fibrin glue was performed, while in the other, standard keratoplasty with 16 sutures was performed, registering surgical time in each case. Best corrected visual acuity and queratometric astigmatism were measured at 3 and 6 months.ResultsAverage surgical time for the fibrin glue group was 36.1minutes vs. 55.1minutes for the control group (P=<.0001). Average queratometric astigmatism at 3m was −3.69D for the fibrin glue group vs. −4.75D for the standard keratoplasty group (P=.245) and −2.88D vs. −3.44D at 6m (P=.246). Average best corrected visual acuity was LogMAR 0.37 for the fibrin glue group vs. LogMAR 0.39 at 3m (P=.822) and LogMAR 0.20 vs. LogMAR 0.25 at 6m (P=.334). There were no complications related to the surgical procedure in any group.ConclusionsPKP with 8 sutures and fibrin glue seems to be a safe technique which requires less surgical time and allows for a faster visual recovery compared to the standard technique.

Keywords

Queratoplastia penetrante, Ophthalmology, Visual acuity, Astigmatismo, Astigmatism, Fibrin glue, RE1-994, Agudeza visual, Adhesivo tisular, Penetrating keratoplasty

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold