
pmid: 22381660
tion. Also, regardless of the orthotic benefit of FES, the process of ‘‘learning-relearning’’ could vary from one individual to another depending upon the person’s inherent ability, and the type of neurological disorder and its severity. In general, this hypothesis therefore explains why individual might have short-lasting effect or no overall significant ‘carry-over’ effect. Our ‘‘learned paralysis’’ hypothesis of ‘carry-over’ effect contributes what may be an important link to understand the mechanisms by which FES induces a therapeutic effect. Further research to evaluate the effects of electrical stimulation therapy in stroke patients—particularly in the area of motor relearning and carry-over phenomenon—is justified and should continue.
Stroke, Stroke Rehabilitation, Humans, Paralysis, Electric Stimulation Therapy, Models, Biological
Stroke, Stroke Rehabilitation, Humans, Paralysis, Electric Stimulation Therapy, Models, Biological
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
