Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Medicina Clínicaarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Medicina Clínica
Article . 2016 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Uso del tratamiento hormonal sustitutivo en España: tendencias en el período 2000-2014

Authors: Laura Baladé Martínez; Dolores Montero Corominas; Diego Macías Saint-Gerons;

Uso del tratamiento hormonal sustitutivo en España: tendencias en el período 2000-2014

Abstract

Resumen Fundamento y objetivo El objetivo de este trabajo fue describir la evolucion del consumo, la oferta y la prevalencia de uso del tratamiento hormonal sustitutivo (THS) en Espana durante el periodo 2000-2014. Metodos La prevalencia de uso anual bruta en mujeres ≥ 40 anos se estimo a partir de datos individuales procedentes de las historias clinicas anonimizadas de la base de datos BIFAP. Para el calculo del consumo se utilizaron datos agregados de dispensacion. El consumo de THS se expreso en dosis diarias definidas dispensadas por cada 1.000 mujeres ≥ 40 anos y dia (DHD). Resultados En el ano 2000 el consumo de THS fue de 33,12 DHD: estrogenos (19,81 DHD), tibolona (6,88 DHD) y estrogenos asociados a progestagenos (6,44 DHD). En 2014 el consumo de THS fue de 5,32 DHD: estrogenos (1,08 DHD), tibolona (1,61 DHD) y estrogenos combinados con progestagenos (2,62 DHD). Las presentaciones comercializadas se redujeron un 46,9%. La prevalencia de uso de THS en mujeres ≥ 40 anos registradas en la base de datos BIFAP ha pasado de un 7,19% (IC 95% 6,97-7,40) en el ano 2001 a un 0,21% (IC 95% 0,20-0,22) en 2014. Las mujeres de 40-45 anos registraron la mayor prevalencia de uso en 2014: 0,71% (IC 95% 0,66-0,76). Conclusiones El consumo y la prevalencia de uso de THS ha descendido de manera notable a partir de la publicacion de los estudios Women's Health Iniciative , Million Women Study y las medidas reguladoras, siguiendo una tendencia similar a la observada en otros paises occidentales.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    16
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
16
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!