<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
handle: 11567/504718
Abstract In the past, ratio scales have been a highly controversial issue between physicists and psychologists as regards the need for an empirical addition operation in order to attain them. This aspect is critical since such an operation is often unavailable in psychophysical experiments, as it is in physics, due to its intensive properties. We propose a reconsideration of ratio scales, showing how they can be obtained when ratio and difference empirical relations are available and when they satisfy proper compatibility conditions. We call such structures “intensive” and provide deterministic and probabilistic axiomatizations in the finite case. We also address the practical applications of these ideas to perceptual measurements.
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |