
pmid: 27693063
Abstract The simple bimolecular ligand–receptor binding interaction is often linearized by assuming pseudo-first-order kinetics when one species is present in excess. Here, a phase-plane analysis allows the derivation of a new condition for the validity of pseudo-first-order kinetics that is independent of the initial receptor concentration. The validity of the derived condition is analyzed from two viewpoints. In the first, time courses of the exact and approximate solutions to the ligand–receptor rate equations are compared when all rate constants are known. The second viewpoint assess the validity through the error induced when the approximate equation is used to estimate kinetic constants from data. Although these two interpretations of validity are often assumed to coincide, we show that they are distinct, and that large errors are possible in estimated kinetic constants, even when the linearized and exact rate equations provide nearly identical solutions.
Kinetics, experimental design, fitting procedure, Biochemistry, molecular biology, approximation validity, ligand-receptor binding, rate constant estimation, Receptors, Cell Surface, pseudo-first-order kinetics, Models, Theoretical, Ligands, Kinetics in biochemical problems (pharmacokinetics, enzyme kinetics, etc.), Protein Binding
Kinetics, experimental design, fitting procedure, Biochemistry, molecular biology, approximation validity, ligand-receptor binding, rate constant estimation, Receptors, Cell Surface, pseudo-first-order kinetics, Models, Theoretical, Ligands, Kinetics in biochemical problems (pharmacokinetics, enzyme kinetics, etc.), Protein Binding
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 19 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
