
arXiv: 2304.14843
handle: 10278/5065781
Two acts are comonotonic if they yield high payoffs in the same states of nature. The main purpose of this paper is to derive a new characterization of Cumulative Prospect Theory (CPT) through simple properties involving comonotonicity. The main novelty is a concept dubbed gain-loss hedging: mixing positive and negative acts creates hedging possibilities even when acts are comonotonic. This allows us to clarify in which sense CPT differs from Choquet expected utility. Our analysis is performed under the simpler case of (piece-wise) constant marginal utility which allows us to clearly separate the perception of uncertainty from the evaluation of outcomes.
cumulative prospect theory, FOS: Economics and business, gain-loss hedging, Cumulative Prospect Theory Comonotonicity Gain–loss hedging Šipoš integral Choquet integral, Economics - Theoretical Economics, Šipoš integral, Theoretical Economics (econ.TH), Choquet integral, comonotonicity, Utility theory
cumulative prospect theory, FOS: Economics and business, gain-loss hedging, Cumulative Prospect Theory Comonotonicity Gain–loss hedging Šipoš integral Choquet integral, Economics - Theoretical Economics, Šipoš integral, Theoretical Economics (econ.TH), Choquet integral, comonotonicity, Utility theory
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
