
This paper introduces an axiomatic approach to the measures of electoral volatility between two consecutive elections, when these measures depend on the number of competing parties and the absolute value of the change in vote shares of the parties. The mathematical results on inequalities are in the basis of the theoretical developments. A one-parameter family of electoral volatility indices, based on \textit{M. N. Pedersen}'s [Eur. J. Polit. Res. 7, No. 1, 1--26 (1979; \url{doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.1979.tb01267.x})] volatility measure, is defined. The electoral volatility measures satisfying a set of axioms (including additive separability) are characterized as those equivalent to some member of this family. Two quasi orders which permit ranking two party systems according to a class of electoral volatility indices satisfying certain axioms are studied. Finally, applications of the theoretical results to Indian state elections are considered.
electoral volatility, inequalities, axioms, Voting theory, Pedersen's volatility measure, quasi orders, History, political science
electoral volatility, inequalities, axioms, Voting theory, Pedersen's volatility measure, quasi orders, History, political science
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
