
handle: 11391/803698
Abstract Magma mixing processes have been widely recognized in both the plutonic and volcanic environments, but the quality and quantity of information that can be extracted from the two environments are substantially different. Understanding the advantages and limits associated with the study of plutonic and volcanic rocks is essential to establish precise methodological approaches to build the most complete conceptual model by merging information from these two complementary igneous environments. In this work we review magmatic interaction processes in the plutonic and volcanic environments by considering several aspects of these geological phenomena. In particular, we first briefly report on the structural and geochemical evidence for magma mixing in both plutonic and volcanic rocks, with the aim to provide a general picture of this natural phenomenon. Successively, we discuss some recent results about magma mixing achieved using the concepts from Chaos Theory and discuss their potential impact on magma differentiation. Finally, we attempt to build a general picture of this igneous process by merging present-day information from both the plutonic and volcanic environments. It emerges from the general picture that the time spent by the magmatic system in the molten or partially molten state is the crucial factor for the preservation of the fingerprints of magma mixing in the two environments. We propose a conceptual model that may be useful to understand what kind of information we can obtain from volcanic and plutonic rocks and, ultimately, to maximize our knowledge about magma mixing.
magma mixing; plutonic and volcanic rocks; chaotic dynamics; numerical modelling; experiments
magma mixing; plutonic and volcanic rocks; chaotic dynamics; numerical modelling; experiments
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 157 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
