Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Revista del Laborato...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Revista del Laboratorio Clínico
Article . 2009 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Evaluación de un método POCT (pruebas a la cabecera del paciente) para la determinación de hemoglobina glucosilada

Authors: Ana María Fernández Ramos; Gemma Cobos Muñoz; Alejandra Aguilera Castillo; Alfredo Enguíx Armada;

Evaluación de un método POCT (pruebas a la cabecera del paciente) para la determinación de hemoglobina glucosilada

Abstract

Resumen Introduccion La hemoglobina glucosilada (HbA1C) presenta un papel fundamental en el control y prevencion de complicaciones en el paciente diabetico, puesto que permite la monitorizacion de sus valores de glucemia en los 3 meses previos al analisis. Debido a la importancia de su determinacion han aparecido diferentes metodos de cuantificacion. El objeto de este trabajo es evaluar el metodo POCT (point of care testing ‘pruebas a la cabecera del paciente’) mediante el aparato In2it de Bio-Rad. Material y metodos Se realizo una comparacion entre 2 metodos de cuantificacion: el HPLC (high–performance liquid chromatography ‘cromatografia liquida de alta resolucion o de alta presion’) (ADAMS-A1c HA-8160, Menarini Diagnostics, Florencia, Italia) y el POCT (In2it, Bio-Rad, California, EE.UU.). Para esto, se compararon los resultados de 60 muestras, ademas de determinar la imprecision intraserial y la imprecision interdiaria de ambos aparatos. Resultados La comparacion entre ambos metodos mostro una buena correlacion entre el HPLC y el POCT: Y=0,4000+1,000 X. Los intervalos de confianza del 95% para la coordenada en el origen y la pendiente fueron de −0,1500 a 0,6500 y de 0,9565 a 1,0769, respectivamente. La imprecision intraserial se situo entre el 2,5 y el 3% (del 2,20 al 3,04%) y la imprecision interdiaria se situo entre el 3,53 y el 2,95% para valores altos y bajos, respectivamente. Discusion El metodo POCT ha demostrado cumplir todos los requisitos tecnicos necesarios para su validacion como metodo para la determinacion de la HbA1C, ya que presenta igualdad de prestaciones analiticas con el metodo HPLC. Ademas, es apropiado para el seguimiento de pacientes diabeticos en atencion primaria, dada su facilidad y sencillez de manejo.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!