
pmid: 29954633
This article compares the effect of different surfactants on foam stability and determines the foam decay relationship, so that the suitability of surfactants in a clinical setting can be evaluated.Five different surfactants were used to prepare sclerosing foam at room temperature using a liquid:gas ratio of 1:4 in vitro. Foam decay experiments were performed for each sample using a laboratory-made foaming apparatus, and the process was recorded using a video camera. The stability indices used included the drainage time, drainage rate, half-life, foam half-life volume, surfactant stability index, and foaming index.The sodium morrhuate foam was relatively more stable than the polidocanol foam, but exhibited weak foaming. After the addition of the surfactants, the foam half-life was less than 300 seconds. The effect of the surfactants on the stability of the sodium morrhuate foam was more pronounced. The surfactant stability indices could be arranged as follows: poloxamer 188 > Tween 80 > macrogol 4000 > propanediol > lecithin. However, the differences in the foaming indices were small.Of the five surfactants tested, poloxamer 188 has best performance to enhance sclerosing foam stability. The addition of the surfactants improved the stability of the sclerosing foams. It was observed that the relationships between the foam half-life and the surfactant stability index and the surfactant concentration follow the power law.
Time Factors, Video Recording, Polysorbates, Poloxamer, Sclerosing Solutions, Polyethylene Glycols, Surface-Active Agents, Drug Stability, Propylene Glycols, Lecithins, Sclerotherapy, Humans, Half-Life
Time Factors, Video Recording, Polysorbates, Poloxamer, Sclerosing Solutions, Polyethylene Glycols, Surface-Active Agents, Drug Stability, Propylene Glycols, Lecithins, Sclerotherapy, Humans, Half-Life
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 23 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
