<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>

COPY SCRIPT

For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu

Carotid Endarterectomy for Treatment of Instent Restenosis

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 01 Dec 2010Publisher:Elsevier BVJournal:Journal of Vascular Surgery, volume 52, page 1,742 (issn: 0741-5214,

Authors: Alberto J. Gonzalez; Michael A. Drummond; R. Scott McCord; H. Edward Garrett;

doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.10.025 , 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.04.009

pmid: 21658888

Carotid Endarterectomy for Treatment of Instent Restenosis

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

In-stent restenosis (ISR) after carotid angioplasty and stenting is becoming evident as more patients undergo carotid stenting and duplex scan surveillance. While redo endovascular therapy has been immediately successful, recurrent stenosis remains a problem. The ideal management of ISR has not been determined. Three cases of symptomatic ISR that were successfully treated by standard carotid endarterectomy (CEA) with removal of the stent are reported herein. Current options for management of ISR are reviewed from the literature.

Related Organizations

University of Tennessee at Knoxville
United States
University of Memphis
United States
University of Tennessee Health Science Center
United States

Keywords

Aged, 80 and over, Male, Endarterectomy, Carotid, Ultrasonography, Doppler, Duplex, Angioplasty, Severity of Illness Index, Treatment Outcome, Recurrence, Humans, Surgery, Carotid Stenosis, Female, Stents, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Device Removal, Aged

Impact byBIP!

	citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	29
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 10%
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Top 10%
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 10%