
pmid: 17544035
Results of treatment for critical limb ischemia have traditionally focused on physician-oriented end points related to limb salvage surgery. Although numerous studies have demonstrated excellent patency and limb salvage after surgical revascularization procedures, survival in this patient population is poor, comorbidities reducing quality of life are rampant, and recovery from limb salvage surgery can be prolonged and complicated despite "success" as defined by traditional reporting methods. Patient-oriented outcome end points, such as health- related quality of life and functional status, are essential in defining optimal treatment options for the population of patients with critical limb ischemia. This area of research remains in its infancy, but will become increasingly important as the population of patients with critical limb ischemia and treatment options for these patients continue to expand. The current status and future outlook of functional and quality of life assessment of patients with critical limb ischemia is reviewed.
Extremities, Recovery of Function, Walking, Amputation, Surgical, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Treatment Outcome, Ischemia, Surveys and Questionnaires, Pressure, Quality of Life, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Surgery, Health Services Research, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Vascular Surgical Procedures, Intermittent Pneumatic Compression Devices, Stockings, Compression, Retrospective Studies
Extremities, Recovery of Function, Walking, Amputation, Surgical, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Treatment Outcome, Ischemia, Surveys and Questionnaires, Pressure, Quality of Life, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Surgery, Health Services Research, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Vascular Surgical Procedures, Intermittent Pneumatic Compression Devices, Stockings, Compression, Retrospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 73 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
