
Abstract A multidimensional model of career success was developed aiming to be more inclusive than existing models. In a first study, 22 managers were asked to tell the story of their careers. At the end of each interview, idiosyncratic career success “construct ladders” were constructed for each interviewee through an interactive process with the interviewer. The 42 superordinate career success operationalizations that came forward through this process were then used as input in a Q-sort study in which 30 subject matter experts (SMEXs) served as judges. Through multidimensional scaling (MDS), a model incorporating the different idiosyncratic meanings the interviewees attached to the career success construct was obtained. A two-dimensional configuration (affect–achievement versus intra-personal–inter-personal) comprising nine regions (performance, advancement, self-development, creativity, security, satisfaction, recognition, cooperation and contribution) was concluded upon as the optimal solution. Correspondences with earlier conceptual models of career success are spelled out.
multidimensional scaling, SELECTION, DIMENSIONS, ORGANIZATIONS, laddering interview method, PSYCHOLOGICAL SUCCESS, BOUNDARYLESS CAREER, 5201 Applied and developmental psychology, Social Sciences, career success, Career success, 1303 Specialist Studies in Education, Business & Management, PERSPECTIVES, 1701 Psychology, q sort, 1503 Business and Management, Psychology, 3507 Strategy, management and organisational behaviour, GENDER, Q-sort, Psychology, Applied, 3505 Human resources and industrial relations
multidimensional scaling, SELECTION, DIMENSIONS, ORGANIZATIONS, laddering interview method, PSYCHOLOGICAL SUCCESS, BOUNDARYLESS CAREER, 5201 Applied and developmental psychology, Social Sciences, career success, Career success, 1303 Specialist Studies in Education, Business & Management, PERSPECTIVES, 1701 Psychology, q sort, 1503 Business and Management, Psychology, 3507 Strategy, management and organisational behaviour, GENDER, Q-sort, Psychology, Applied, 3505 Human resources and industrial relations
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 178 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
