Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Journal of Thoracic ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Article
License: Elsevier Non-Commercial
Data sources: UnpayWall
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Article . 2005
License: Elsevier Non-Commercial
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Article . 2005 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier Non-Commercial
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Laryngopharyngeal dysfunction after the Norwood procedure

Authors: Margaret L. Skinner; Lucinda A. Halstead; Diane Andrews; Catherine S. Rubinstein; Andrew M. Atz; Scott M. Bradley;

Laryngopharyngeal dysfunction after the Norwood procedure

Abstract

We sought to evaluate the incidence and significance of recurrent laryngeal nerve and swallowing dysfunction after a Norwood procedure compared with that after biventricular aortic arch reconstruction.From April 2003 through December 2004, 36 neonates underwent a Norwood procedure; 33 of 36 had postoperative fiberoptic laryngoscopy and modified barium swallow. Study results were used to guide the transition from nasogastric tube to oral feeding and placement of gastrostomy tubes. During the same time period, 18 neonates underwent aortic arch reconstruction as part of a biventricular repair.After a Norwood procedure, laryngoscopy showed left true vocal fold (cord) paralysis in 3 (9%) of 33 patients. The results of a modified barium swallow were abnormal in 16 (48%) of 33 patients, with aspiration in 8 (24%) of 33 patients. Of the 3 patients with vocal fold paralysis, 2 had a normal modified barium swallow result, and 1 had aspiration. Gastrostomy tubes were placed in 6 (18%) of 33 patients, all with an abnormal modified barium swallow result. Hospital stay was longer in patients with an abnormal modified barium swallow result: 34 +/- 13 versus 22 +/- 7 days (P < .01). After biventricular repair with aortic arch reconstruction, left true vocal fold paralysis occurred in 4 (25%) of 16 patients; results of a modified barium swallow were abnormal in 10 (59%) of 17 patients, with aspiration in 6 (35%) of 17 patients (all nonsignificant vs patients undergoing the Norwood procedure). Follow-up laryngoscopy in 4 patients with vocal fold paralysis showed no change in 3 of 4 patients and improvement in 1 patient. Follow-up modified barium swallow showed resolution of aspiration in 11 (85%) of 13 patients. Hospital survival was 32 (89%) of 36 patients for the Norwood procedure and 18 (100%) of 18 patients for biventricular repair. There has been 1 sudden death before second-stage palliation.After a Norwood procedure, swallowing dysfunction occurs in 48% of patients, with aspiration in 24%, and results in increased length of hospital stay. Left recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, seen in 9% of patients, is an uncommon cause of swallowing dysfunction. Postoperative aspiration generally resolves over time, whereas vocal fold paralysis does not. Systematic evaluation of swallowing function allows appropriate tailoring of feeding regimens and might contribute to decreased hospital and interstage mortality.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Heart Defects, Congenital, Infant, Newborn, Pharyngeal Diseases, Laryngeal Diseases, Postoperative Complications, Humans, Surgery, Cardiac Surgical Procedures, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Deglutition Disorders, Vocal Cord Paralysis

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    143
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
143
Top 1%
Top 1%
Top 10%
hybrid