Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Journal of Thoracic ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Article
License: Elsevier Non-Commercial
Data sources: UnpayWall
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Article . 2004
License: Elsevier Non-Commercial
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Article . 2004 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier Non-Commercial
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Sleeve segmentectomy for non–small cell lung carcinoma

Authors: Okada, Morihito; Nishio, Wataru; Sakamoto, Toshihiko; Uchino, Kazuya; Yuki, Tsuyoshi; Nakagawa, Akio; Tsubota, Noriaki;

Sleeve segmentectomy for non–small cell lung carcinoma

Abstract

Although sleeve segmentectomy for centrally located lung cancers was originally designed for patients unable to tolerate lobectomy, we have tried it in patients with noncompromised function as well. We evaluated the efficiency of this atypical type of bronchoplasty.Of 202 patients for whom we performed bronchoplasty for primary non-small cell lung carcinoma, 16 underwent sleeve segmentectomy.Sixteen patients were classified into 4 groups according to the mode of bronchial reconstruction: type A, anastomosis between the right intermediate or left main and basal segmental bronchi with removal of the superior segment of the lower lobe (S6; n = 7); type B, anastomosis between the left main and lingular bronchi with removal of the upper division of the left upper lobe (S1+2+3; n = 3); type C, anastomosis between the left main and upper division bronchi with removal of the lingular segments (S4+5; n = 4); and type D, others (n = 2). Nine patients had pulmonary function sufficient to tolerate lobectomy. The tumors were completely resected in all patients. Combined performance of pulmonary angioplasty was carried out in 2 patients. Bronchial reconstruction was successful in all patients, with neither bronchial complications nor local recurrences. Ten patients had stage IA disease, and 6 had more advanced disease. All patients were alive, except 1 who died as a result of distant metastasis and 2 who died of noncancerous causes. Overall 3-year and 5-year survivals were 93.3% and 68.1%, respectively.Sleeve segmentectomy, which is technically demanding, should be considered in patients with centrally located and possibly curable early non-small cell lung cancer because the prevalence of small-sized or multiple lung tumors has been increasing and because our findings suggest that this lung-saving operation is safe and useful.

Keywords

Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Adult, Male, Lung Neoplasms, Middle Aged, 10, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Humans, Surgery, Female, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pneumonectomy, Aged, Follow-Up Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    27
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
27
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
hybrid
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research