Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Journal of Surgical ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Journal of Surgical Research
Article . 2016 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratios predict gastric cancer surgical outcomes

Authors: Jun-Te, Hsu; Chia-Cheng, Wang; Puo-Hsien, Le; Tsung-Hsing, Chen; Chia-Jung, Kuo; Chun-Jung, Lin; Wen-Chi, Chou; +1 Authors

Lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratios predict gastric cancer surgical outcomes

Abstract

The prognostic role of the preoperative lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma (GC) remains unclear. The aim of this study was to explore the prognostic potential of the preoperative LMR in patients with resectable GC.The medical records of 926 consecutive patients with resectable GC between 2005 and 2010 were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. Patients were stratified into two groups based on the preoperative LMR with a cutoff value of 4.8 (group 1: LMR ≤ 4.8; group 2: LMR > 4.8). Clinicopathologic factors potentially affecting patient outcomes were collected prospectively and analyzed.Compared to group 2, in group 1, there was a higher percentage of men, patients aged >48 y, total gastrectomy, tumor size > 4.8 cm, T4 lesions, N3 disease, metastatic tumors, advanced stage, ratio of metastatic to examined lymph nodes > 0.18, R1 resection, and occurrence of vascular or lymphatic invasion. Group 1 also had a higher 30-d surgical mortality rate (groups 1 versus 2 at 2.9% versus 0.5%; P = 0.006) and lower 3-y and 5-y overall survival (53.6% versus 71.9% and 46.4% versus 63.3%, respectively; P < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis showed that preoperative low LMR was an unfavorable prognostic factor for resectable GC.Patients with lower LMR had more aggressive tumor behavior, higher surgical mortality rates, and worse long-term survival. The preoperative LMR may serve as an independent prognostic factor for prediction of surgical outcomes and for assisting clinicians in determining future treatment plans.

Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Adenocarcinoma, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Survival Analysis, Monocytes, Gastrectomy, Stomach Neoplasms, Preoperative Period, Humans, Female, Lymphocyte Count, Lymphocytes, Biomarkers, Aged, Follow-Up Studies, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    63
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
63
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!