Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Journal of South Ame...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Journal of South American Earth Sciences
Article . 2011 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Petrology and SHRIMP U–Pb zircon geochronology of Cordilleran granitoids of the Bariloche area, Argentina

Authors: A. Castro; I. Moreno-Ventas; C. Fernández; G. Vujovich; G. Gallastegui; N. Heredia; R.D. Martino; +6 Authors

Petrology and SHRIMP U–Pb zircon geochronology of Cordilleran granitoids of the Bariloche area, Argentina

Abstract

Abstract A petrological and geochronological study of Cordilleran granitoid intrusions in the Bariloche area (Argentina) point to a complex time-compositional evolution of magmatic processes in relation with oblique subduction of the Phoenix plate below the South America active margin during Jurassic times. The observed geochemical variations in both major and trace elements, together with the textural and mineralogical relations, point to a roughly defined, overall process of magmatic “filtering” linking all the intrusive batholithic rocks of the Bariloche area. These data suggest that the composition of the parental magma that underwent fractionation may be an intermediate magma with SiO 2 = 58–60 wt%, MgO = 2.5 wt%, FeO = 6.5 wt%, CaO = 6.1. These are coincident with the typical compositions of evolved andesites. Magnetite, amphibole and plagioclase are the main phases involved in the fractionation process. According to Hbl thermobarometry, fractionation may have taken place, at least in part, at shallow pressures ( P = 0.5–1.5 kbar), possibly at the level of emplacement. The coupled observations of the two pressure dependent ratios, namely Sr/Y and La/Yb are pointing to a low-pressure, low-temperature final fractionation dominated by only Pl. The geochronologic study by U–Pb SHRIMP zircon determinations of 14 samples from granites, tonalites and diorites yield a broad range of about 20 Ma, between 150 and 170 Ma at the Medium Jurassic. The batholith was accomplished by a protracted magmatic activity that lasted for about 20 Ma. This time is much longer than the time elapsed from intrusion to complete crystallization of shallow magma chambers. It is concluded that amalgamation of discrete magma pulses is the dominant process that built-up the batholith. The observed structures suggest that the fractures conditioning the emplacement of the magma batches were arranged en echelon and show a right-stepping. The resulting geometry is compatible with the activity of a large-scale, sinistral, N–S trending, strike-slip fracture zone permitting the emplacement of each magma pulse. This major, strike-slip fault system should be deeply entrenched in the crust to allow intruding magmas generated and fractionated at depth. Because batholith generation is a direct consequence of subduction, structural relations and ages can be used to constraint the plate motion relations during Jurassic in this region of the South America active margin.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    84
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
84
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!