Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Journal of Endodonti...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Journal of Endodontics
Article . 2012 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Infection of Apical Dentin and Root-end Cavity Disinfection

Authors: Abdul, Aziz; Nicholas P, Chandler; Catharina H J, Hauman; Jonathan W, Leichter; Andrew, McNaughton; Geoffrey R, Tompkins;

Infection of Apical Dentin and Root-end Cavity Disinfection

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess Enterococcus faecalis penetration into the dentin of the apical 3 mm and bacterial death after the application of either chlorhexidine or laser to root-end cavities.Root canals of 60 single-rooted teeth were prepared. In part 1, cementum was removed semicircumferentially from 21 roots, and the smear layer was removed from 15 roots using 17% EDTA/cetrimide. Teeth were inoculated and incubated with E. faecalis for 10 days, rinsed, and live/dead stained. The effect of cementum and smear on bacterial penetration was assessed by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). In part 2, 39 teeth had root ends resected and cavities ultrasonically prepared. Inoculated roots were assigned to 1 of the following 3 groups: (1) root-end cavities irrigated with 0.2 % chlorhexidine, (2) root-end cavities irradiated with a laser for 20 seconds at 1.5 W, or (3) root-end cavities that received no treatment. Roots were live/dead stained, sectioned, and examined by CLSM. The depth of the bacterial penetration and bacterial survival were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test.The presence of a smear layer and/or cementum did not significantly affect bacterial penetration. In root-end cavities, chlorhexidine was more effective than laser (P < .001), reducing bacterial viability by 93% versus 70% with a laser.E. faecalis invaded the entire width of dentin in the apical 3 mm irrespective of the smear layer and/or cementum. Chlorhexidine was more effective than laser in disinfecting root-end cavities.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Dental Cementum, Microscopy, Confocal, Root Canal Irrigants, Ultrasonic Therapy, Chlorhexidine, Colony Count, Microbial, Dentinal Fluid, Disinfection, Tooth Apex, Smear Layer, Dentin, Enterococcus faecalis, Humans, Lasers, Semiconductor, Edetic Acid, Root Canal Preparation

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    7
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
7
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!