Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Journal of Clinical ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Article . 2009 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
UQ eSpace
Article . 2009
Data sources: UQ eSpace
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

Bone and Muscle Parameters of the Tibia: Agreement Between the XCT 2000 and XCT 3000 Instruments

Authors: Burrows, Melonie; Cooper, David M. L.; Liu, Danmei; McKay, Heather A.;

Bone and Muscle Parameters of the Tibia: Agreement Between the XCT 2000 and XCT 3000 Instruments

Abstract

Peripheral quantitative computed tomography is a valuable tool to assess bone in children across growth, with long-term studies capturing nuances missed in cross-sectional studies. As children grow, a change from XCT 2000 to a XCT 3000 may be required to accommodate the increasing size of the lower limbs. We examined the precision and agreement between the Stratec XCT 2000 and 3000 on selected bone and muscle parameters. Twenty-eight participants (mean+/-SD; age 27.5+/-6.5 yr) underwent scans at the distal (8%), mid (50%), and proximal (66%) tibia sites, to assess total bone area, total bone density, and trabecular density (8% site); and total bone area, cortical area, cortical density (CoD), polar strength-strain index, and muscle cross-sectional area (50% and 66% sites). Outcomes between instruments were highly correlated; r=0.90-0.99 for CoD across sites, with r=0.97-0.99 for all other measures. Bland and Altman plots showed excellent agreement between instruments for all variables. Regression indicated no significant relationship between instrument and size of measurement (p>0.05). Coefficients of variation were lower than previously reported (0.4-2.4%). For longitudinal studies, the XCT 3000 can replace the XCT 2000 with minimal influence on bone and muscle parameters.

Country
Australia
Keywords

Adult, Male, Tibia, Bone geometry, Peripheral quantitative computed tomography, Reproducibility of Results, 1103 Clinical Sciences, Bone strength, Bone Density, Humans, Regression Analysis, Female, Muscle, Skeletal, Tomography, X-Ray Computed

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    16
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
16
Average
Average
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!