
pmid: 21907354
The clinical diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) usually takes several months. The delay in diagnosis compromises the effective therapeutic interventions. Therefore, the present study was aimed to develop a statistical model for predicting the risk of ALS at earlier stages for better management of ALS patients.The study recruited 44 sporadic ALS patients and 29 normal controls. Thirteen different independent variables (predictors) which were believed to be associated with ALS were included in the study. Forward stepwise (likelihood ratio) binary logistic regression was used to find significant variables and probability of disease prediction.The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit statistic (χ(2)=4.379, df=8, p=0.821) indicate the appropriateness of forward stepwise (likelihood ratio) binary logistic regression model. Serum chemokine ligand-2, chemokine ligand-2 mRNA, vascular endothelial growth factor-A mRNA, smoking and alcohol consumption are the independent variables found significant to predict risk of ALS (p<0.05). The current model yielded 93.2% sensitivity and 86.2% specificity with 90.4% overall validity of correct ALS prediction.Forward stepwise (likelihood ratio) binary logistic regression model is an accurate method to predict ALS in the presence of serum CCL2, CCL2 mRNA, VEGFA mRNA, smoking and alcohol consumption with high sensitivity and specificity. However, bed side diagnostic utility of these variables needs to be validated further in larger ALS cohorts.
Adult, Male, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Middle Aged, Early Diagnosis, Logistic Models, Predictive Value of Tests, Risk Factors, Humans, Female, Biomarkers
Adult, Male, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Middle Aged, Early Diagnosis, Logistic Models, Predictive Value of Tests, Risk Factors, Humans, Female, Biomarkers
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 15 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
