Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Journal of the Mecha...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Biomechanical properties of porcine cornea; planar biaxial tests versus uniaxial tensile tests

Authors: Hamed Hatami-Marbini; Md Esharuzzaman Emu;

Biomechanical properties of porcine cornea; planar biaxial tests versus uniaxial tensile tests

Abstract

The cornea is a transparent tissue whose mechanical properties are important for its optical and physiological functions. The mechanical properties of cornea depend on the composition and microstructure of its extracellular matrix, which is composed of collagen fibrils with preferential orientations. The present research was done in order to characterize corneal mechanical response using the biaxial mechanical testing method and to compare biaxial measurements with those found from uniaxial tensile tests. For this purpose, thirty square-shaped specimens excised from the center of porcine cornea were mounted into an ElectroForce TestBench device such that their superior/inferior (SI) and nasal/temporal (NT) meridians were aligned with motor axes. Furthermore, ten corneal strips dissected from the NT direction (n = 5) and SI direction (n = 5) were mounted into an RSA-G2 Solid Analyzer testing machine. The biaxial experiments were performed at stretch ratios of 1:1, 1:0.5, 0.5:1, 1:0.01, and 0.01:1 and displacement rates of 2 mm/min (n = 20) and 10 mm/min (n = 10). The uniaxial experiments were done using the displacement rate of 2 mm/min. The planar square-shaped samples tested under equibiaxial loading showed similar mechanical response in NT and SI directions. Furthermore, uniaxial experiments revealed no significant difference in tensile response of corneal strips excised from NT and SI directions. However, equibiaxial testing tensile stresses were significantly larger than those found from uniaxial tensile measurements. The mechanical behavior of cornea in biaxial tests was dependent on the applied stretch ratio. The differences and similarities between uniaxial and biaxial experimental measurements were discussed and it was concluded that the planar biaxial testing method characterized the mechanical response of cornea by mimicking its in vivo loading state more closely than uniaxial experiments.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Cornea, Swine, Tensile Strength, Materials Testing, Mechanical Tests, Animals, Stress, Mechanical, Biomechanical Phenomena, Mechanical Phenomena

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    6
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
6
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!