
Abstract The workability of aluminium–SiC and Al2O3-reinforced metal matrix composites (APMMCs) prepared by stir-casting, squeeze-casting and powder metallurgy techniques has been studied by using up-set test. Different parameters of APMMC were considered such as type of Al matrix alloy, type of particulate reinforcement and particulate volume fraction and size. The up-set test was conducted on cylindrical specimens with 8 mm diameter and 8 mm height, successively as repeated compressions with intermediate heat treatment (IHT). Generally, the workability index (WI) has been positively affected by decreasing particulate size and volume fraction (Vf). Stir casting resulted in a slightly better workability than that obtained in case of powder metallurgy, while squeeze casting showed promising behavior in the case of composites with high-particulate Vf. The highest workability index (WI), was obtained in case of APMMC with wrought Al matrix and SiC reinforcement. Some rolling experiments were additionally conducted on such composite, where WI estimated was compared to that of the up-set tests.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 35 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
