
pmid: 17067681
This study was designed to compare cefepime exposures with microbiological outcomes in ESBL and non-ESBL infections and determine the pharmacodynamic profiles associated with successful outcome.Cefepime pharmacodynamic exposures of unbound drug [time above MIC (fT>MIC), minimal concentration over MIC (fC(min)/MIC), and area under the curve over MIC (fAUC/MIC)] for 18 patients with ESBL and non-ESBL infections were determined by using a published population pharmacokinetic model. Classification and regression tree analysis was used to identify pharmacodynamic breakpoints that predicted eradication. A 5000-patient Monte Carlo Simulation was conducted to estimate the probability of target attainment for the goal pharmacodynamic exposures.Eradication was 80% when fT>MIC was 50% compared with 0% when T>MIC was less than 50% (p7.6 and only 33.3% were eradicated when fC(min)/MICMIC and fAUC/MIC>1654 were also predictive of eradication. While conventional dosage regimens of 2g q 12h and q 8h failed to achieve adequate target attainment, 4 g continuous infusion and 2g q 6-8h prolonged infusion could attain more than 90% of target attainment at the MIC of 2 microg/ml for the breakpoint of fCmin/MIC=7.6.Microbiological eradication in patients receiving cefepime was best predicted by fCmin/MIC ratio greater than 7.6 regardless of the presence of an ESBL. Continuous or prolonged infusion regimens provided the greatest probability of attaining this exposure.
Male, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Middle Aged, beta-Lactamases, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Cephalosporins, Klebsiella Infections, Treatment Outcome, Case-Control Studies, Klebsiella, Escherichia coli, Humans, Female, Cefepime, Monte Carlo Method, Escherichia coli Infections, Aged
Male, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Middle Aged, beta-Lactamases, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Cephalosporins, Klebsiella Infections, Treatment Outcome, Case-Control Studies, Klebsiella, Escherichia coli, Humans, Female, Cefepime, Monte Carlo Method, Escherichia coli Infections, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 50 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
