
handle: 10722/177805
This article presents a model for competition of talents between organizations in the presence of the peer effect, which denotes that one organization may become more desirable than another in the presence of high quality colleagues. The article begins by modeling this as a three-stage game between two organizations, with a utility function that is linear to the average type of organization they join and the resource they receive in the organization. This is followed by an indirect method for finding the equilibrium and a proof that the produced equilibrium is unique under certain conditions. Finally, the authors explore the implications of the `raiding lemma', a key result in the model which determines the minimum resource budget needed by one organization to achieve any quality difference against any resource distribution schedule of the other organization.
Resource Distribution, Organization Competition, Other game-theoretic models, peer effect, Sorting, Peer Effect, Special types of economic equilibria, organization competition, sorting, resource distribution
Resource Distribution, Organization Competition, Other game-theoretic models, peer effect, Sorting, Peer Effect, Special types of economic equilibria, organization competition, sorting, resource distribution
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 14 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
