
pmid: 18647645
The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of chronic treatment with C. multijuga oil on Ehrlich tumor evolution. C. multijuga was fractionated in a KOH impregnated silica gel column chromatography to give three distinct fractions, i.e., hexanic, chloroformic, and methanolic, mainly composed by hydrocarbon sesquiterpenes, oxygenated sesquiterpenes and acidic diterpenes, respectively. Results demonstrated that the C. multijuga oil, the hexanic, and chloroformic fractions did not develop toxic effects. The oil, hexanic and chloroformic fractions (doses varying between 100 and 200mg/kg) showed antineoplasic properties against Ehrlich ascitic tumor (EAT) and solid tumor during 10 consecutive days of treatment inhibiting ascitic tumor cell number, reverting medulla and blood cell counts to values similar to control group, and inhibiting the increase on several inflammatory mediators (total protein, PGE(2), nitric oxide, and TNF) on ascitic fluid. The treatment also inhibited the increase in paw volume on tumor-inoculated mice. In conclusion, C. multijuga as well as its fractions demonstrated antineoplasic effect even after oral administration confirming its use by traditional medicine.
Male, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Plant Extracts, Administration, Oral, Fabaceae, Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic, Blood Cell Count, Rats, Mice, Animals, Ascitic Fluid, Plant Oils, Inflammation Mediators, Rats, Wistar, Carcinoma, Ehrlich Tumor
Male, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Plant Extracts, Administration, Oral, Fabaceae, Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic, Blood Cell Count, Rats, Mice, Animals, Ascitic Fluid, Plant Oils, Inflammation Mediators, Rats, Wistar, Carcinoma, Ehrlich Tumor
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 48 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
