
We study experimentally the relationship between distributional preferences and competitive behavior. We find that spiteful subjects react strongest to competitive pressure and win in a tournament significantly more often than efficiency-minded and inequality averse subjects. However, when given the choice between a tournament and a piece rate scheme, efficiency-minded subjects choose the tournament most often, while spiteful and inequality averse subjects avoid it. When controlling for distributional preferences, risk attitudes and past performance, the gender gap in the willingness to compete is no longer significant, indicating that gender-related variables explain why twice as many men as women self-select into competition.
Economics and Econometrics, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Competition, ddc:330, gender gap, Article, Distributional preferences, Competition, distributional preferences, gender gap, C91, D03, Gender gap, distributional preferences, jel: jel:C91, jel: jel:D03
Economics and Econometrics, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Competition, ddc:330, gender gap, Article, Distributional preferences, Competition, distributional preferences, gender gap, C91, D03, Gender gap, distributional preferences, jel: jel:C91, jel: jel:D03
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 119 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
