
Do laboratory experiments provide a reliable basis for measuring field preferences? Economists recognize that preferences can differ across individuals, but only a few attempts have been made to elicit individual preferences for representative samples of a population in a particular geographical area, region or country. Our primary objective is to directly compare estimates of preferences elicited from a convenience sample and the estimates for the wider population from which that sample is drawn. We examine the strengths and weaknesses of laboratory and field experiments to detect differences in preferences over risk and time that are associated with standard, observable characteristics of the individual.
CALIBRATION, CHOICES, Economics, TRAINING-PROGRAMS, Discount rates, Laboratory experiments, Risk aversion, PROPENSITY, Field experiments, [QFIN] Quantitative Finance [q-fin], RISK-AVERSION, Preferences, SCORE, DENMARK, CAUSAL, UTILITY-THEORY, ATTITUDES, Social Sciences & Humanities, FINANCIAL DECISION-MAKING
CALIBRATION, CHOICES, Economics, TRAINING-PROGRAMS, Discount rates, Laboratory experiments, Risk aversion, PROPENSITY, Field experiments, [QFIN] Quantitative Finance [q-fin], RISK-AVERSION, Preferences, SCORE, DENMARK, CAUSAL, UTILITY-THEORY, ATTITUDES, Social Sciences & Humanities, FINANCIAL DECISION-MAKING
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 103 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
