<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
pmid: 27956295
This review analyzed the effect of pseudoexfoliation (PXF) syndrome on the risk for surgical complications during phacoemulsification. Peer-reviewed literature in Medline, Embase, Lilacs, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases was systematically searched, along with gray literature in the Teseo and National Institutes of Health clinical trials database. Clinical trial, cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies comparing phacoemulsification complications in patients with and without PXF were identified, and 22 of 30 studies were selected for analysis. Odds ratios (ORs) for posterior capsule rupture or zonular dialysis were calculated and pooled using random-effects models. A random-effects meta-regression model was also generated. Using the random-effects model, the pooled OR was 2.1363 (95% confidence interval, 1.5394-2.9648), which corresponds to a risk of more than 10%. No significant changes to this risk were observed in the cumulative or stratified analyses. Although advances in surgical technique have been made, PXF syndrome continues to be a risk factor in phacoemulsification.No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
Cross-Sectional Studies, Phacoemulsification, Humans, Exfoliation Syndrome, Intraoperative Complications
Cross-Sectional Studies, Phacoemulsification, Humans, Exfoliation Syndrome, Intraoperative Complications
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 26 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |