
pmid: 22154012
To assess the impact on incision size of IOL implantation using a new motorized intraocular lens (IOL) injector versus a standard manual injector.Cataract Treatment Centre, Sunderland Eye Infirmary, Sunderland, United Kingdom.Comparative case series.All patients received an Acrysof SN60WF IOL implanted using a D cartridge and an Autosert motorized injector at fast speed, an Autosert motorized injector at slow speed, or a manual Monarch injector. Each group had a range of preimplantation incision sizes (1.9 mm, 2.0 mm, 2.1 mm, 2.2 mm, 2.3 mm). Incision gauges were used to measure the incision width before and immediately after IOL implantation.The study recruited 256 patients. All incisions that were 1.8 mm at the commencement of surgery increased in size by the end of irrigation/aspiration. The motorized injector used with a fast speed (4.4 mm/sec) caused significantly less incision enlargement than the manual injector for all preimplantation incision sizes tested (P<.02). For 4 of the 5 preimplantation incision size subgroups, the motorized injector used at slow speed (1.5 mm/sec) produced less incision stretch than the manual injector, although the difference did not reach statistical significance.The motorized injector was easy to use, and its use with an injection speed of 4.4 mm/sec caused significantly less incision enlargement than the manual injector during IOL implantation.
Lenses, Intraocular, Microsurgery, Phacoemulsification, Time Factors, Acrylic Resins, Surgically-Created Structures, Cornea, Lens Implantation, Intraocular, Drainage, Humans, Prospective Studies, Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions
Lenses, Intraocular, Microsurgery, Phacoemulsification, Time Factors, Acrylic Resins, Surgically-Created Structures, Cornea, Lens Implantation, Intraocular, Drainage, Humans, Prospective Studies, Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 27 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
