Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Journal of Cataract ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Article . 2007 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Torsional mode versus conventional ultrasound mode phacoemulsification

Randomized comparative clinical study
Authors: Yizhi, Liu; Mingbing, Zeng; Xialin, Liu; Lixia, Luo; Zhaohui, Yuan; Yuanlin, Xia; Yangfa, Zeng;

Torsional mode versus conventional ultrasound mode phacoemulsification

Abstract

To compare the intraoperative and short-term postoperative outcomes of cataract surgery performed with torsional mode and conventional ultrasound mode using the Infiniti Vision System (Alcon Laboratories).Cataract Service, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun-Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.In this randomized comparative study, 525 eyes were assigned to phacoemulsification by torsional mode or conventional ultrasound (US) mode. The surgery was performed by an experienced surgeon, and the outcomes were evaluated by an examiner who was masked to treatment assignments. Primary outcome measures were US time (UST), cumulative dissipated energy (CDE), and surgical complications. Patients were seen 1, 7, and 30 days after surgery. Postoperative outcome measures were the final best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and the change in corneal clarity, central corneal thickness (CCT), and endothelial cell count.The US group had 262 eyes and the torsional group, 263 eyes. All patients completed the follow-up visits. In the eyes with nucleus density grades of 1, 2, 3, and 4, the mean UST was 10.25 seconds +/- 7.4 (SD), 25.14 +/- 5.5 seconds, 36.45 +/- 8.3 seconds, and 61.44 +/- 17.8, respectively, in the US group and 8.32 +/- 6.8 seconds, 18.45 +/- 7.2 seconds, 29.48 +/- 12.4 seconds, and 48.39 +/- 20.3 seconds, respectively, in the torsional group (P.01). At 1 day and 7 days, the mean CCT was 625 +/- 80 microm and 568 +/- 37 microm, respectively, in the US group and 601 +/- 35 microm and 559 +/- 40 microm, respectively, in the torsional group (P.01). At 7 days and 30 days, the mean central corneal endothelial cell count was 2135 +/- 858 cells/mm(2) and 2084 +/- 527 cells/mm(2), respectively, in the US group and 2004 +/- 656 cells/mm(2) and 1953 +/- 615 cells/mm(2), respectively, in the torsional group (P<.001).The torsional mode may provide more effective lens removal with a lower level of phacoemulsification time and energy.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Phacoemulsification, Ultrasonic Therapy, Endothelium, Corneal, Visual Acuity, Cell Count, Cornea, Intraoperative Period, Treatment Outcome, Humans, Postoperative Period, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    156
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
156
Top 10%
Top 1%
Top 1%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!