Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Journal of Controlle...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Journal of Controlled Release
Article . 2013 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

In vitro techniques to evaluate buccal films

Authors: Sree Harsha; Rachna Kumria; Ibrahim A. Alhaider; Bandar E. Al-Dhubiab; Anroop B. Nair; Mahesh Attimarad;

In vitro techniques to evaluate buccal films

Abstract

Extensive research on transmucosal drug delivery in the past few decades has resulted in the clinical application of several drug molecules through the buccal route. Interestingly, most of the new chemical moieties under clinical trials are being screened for their potential to deliver through the buccal cavity. In this context, buccal film offers several advantages including convenient dosing and better patient compliance. However, the greatest challenge is to develop a high quality buccal film which also necessitates constant evaluation and understanding the performance of the dosage form, the critical steps to achieve a successful product development. Despite the intense focus on buccal film based drug delivery system, there are no official standardized methods for its evaluation. Significant efforts have been made to demonstrate and improve the efficacy, potency and safety of buccal film using in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo assessments. Besides the physical properties of the film, several other parameters such as residence time, mucoadhesion, drug release, in vitro and in vivo buccal permeation profiles and absorption kinetics of the drug are examined while characterizing the prepared buccal films. However, various research groups have employed different methods and experimental conditions to evaluate the formulation, which has limited the comparison of data between the research groups. This review provides an overview about the various parameters that are considered and assessed as a part of formulation development to ensure quality product with desired characteristics.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Drug Carriers, Polymers, Surface Properties, Mouth Mucosa, Administration, Buccal, Equipment Design, Models, Biological, Elasticity, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Solubility, Tensile Strength, Materials Testing, Animals, Tissue Adhesives, Crystallization, Porosity

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    255
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
255
Top 1%
Top 10%
Top 1%
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?