
pmid: 21700261
We read with interest the randomized study by Habara et al. ([1][1]) comparing paclitaxel-eluting balloon (PB) (n = 25) with conventional balloon (BA) (n = 25) in patients suffering from sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) in-stent restenosis (ISR). In these patients, PB provided a dramatic improvement in
Coronary Restenosis, Male, Sirolimus, Paclitaxel, Humans, Cardiovascular Agents, Drug-Eluting Stents, Female, Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Coronary Restenosis, Male, Sirolimus, Paclitaxel, Humans, Cardiovascular Agents, Drug-Eluting Stents, Female, Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
