<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
pmid: 32062365
Antigen-binding (Fab) and crystallizable (Fc) fragments are the active components of yolk immunoglobulin (IgY), which have been widely used in the pharmaceutical field. However, the common purification methods for the Fab and Fc fragments use combinations of multi-columns are complex and time-consuming. The objective of this study was to improve the separation efficiency of the Fab and Fc fragments from the hydrolyzed IgY and increase the purity of the isolated Fab and Fc fragments. Natural IgY was hydrolyzed using papain for 6 hr and then treated with 45% saturated ammonium sulfate to remove small molecular-weight-peptides. The fraction containing Fab and Fc fragments was loaded on a DEAE-Sepharose ion exchange column and the Fab fraction was washed out first with 10 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.6). Then, the Fc fraction bound to the DEAE Sepharose was eluted with 10 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.6) containing 0.21 M NaCl. The purity of the two fragments was 88.7% and 90.1%, respectively. The results of Western blotting and MS analyses indicated that this method purified Fab and Fc fractions with high purity. This method is easy and simple compared with other methods, and the active fragments separated can be easily used.
Immunoglobulin Fab Fragments, Ammonium Sulfate, Blotting, Western, Papain, Animals, Immunoglobulins, Chromatography, Ion Exchange, Chickens, Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments
Immunoglobulin Fab Fragments, Ammonium Sulfate, Blotting, Western, Papain, Animals, Immunoglobulins, Chromatography, Ion Exchange, Chickens, Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 14 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |