
pmid: 16781896
Colonisation with Burkholderia cepacia complex pathogens has been associated with accelerated decline in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients. The two most common species among the CF community are Burkholderia cenocepacia and Burkholderia multivorans. However, Burkholderia dolosa has recently been causing concern due to its transmissibility and virulence in CF patients.We have compared the ability of five B. dolosa strains to invade lung epithelial cells in vitro with other members of the Bcc. The bacterial epithelial cell interaction was visualised by transmission electron microscopy. We have also examined the ability of these strains to form biofilms in vitro.We have found that members of this species can invade pulmonary epithelial cells in vitro as readily as those from B. cenocepacia and B. multivorans. Confirmation of intracellular invasion was obtained by transmission electron microscopy. B. dolosa strains were readily observed in membrane bound vesicles inside the lung epithelial cells. In addition, strains from this species were capable of forming strong biofilms at a level comparable to the more clinically relevant species.B. dolosa shows comparable virulence characteristics in vitro to the two most clinically relevant species indicating precautions should be taken when this species is identified in the CF population.
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Cystic Fibrosis, Virulence, Biofilm, Burkholderia cepacia complex, Cytoplasmic Vesicles, Burkholderia Infections, Respiratory Mucosa, Cell Line, Invasion, Microscopy, Electron, Transmission, Biofilms, Humans, Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health, Burkholderia dolosa
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Cystic Fibrosis, Virulence, Biofilm, Burkholderia cepacia complex, Cytoplasmic Vesicles, Burkholderia Infections, Respiratory Mucosa, Cell Line, Invasion, Microscopy, Electron, Transmission, Biofilms, Humans, Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health, Burkholderia dolosa
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 37 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
