
pmid: 19682925
Ions near the high-end border of a mass defect distribution plot for native peptide fragment ions have potential as signature markers that are based on mass-to-charge ratio determination. The specificity of these marker ions, including phosphoryl ions, can be improved by removing interfering isobaric ions from the border region on the distribution plot. These interfering ions are rich in Asp and Glu content. The masses of amino acid residues and peptides are rescaled from the IUPAC scale (12C = 12 u as the mass reference) to the averagine scale (averagine mass = 111 u* as the mass reference with zero mass defect; u*: the mass unit on the averagine scale), using a scaling factor of 0.999493894. It is theoretically predicted that esterification of Asp and Glu side-chain carboxylates with n-butanol can achieve a sufficient retreat of the high-end border on a mass defect distribution plot based on the use of mass spectrometers with better-than-medium resolution. Theoretical calculations and laboratory experiments are performed to examine effects of various esterifications on the averagine-scale mass defect distribution of peptide fragment ions and on the specificity of two positive phosphoryl ions: the phosphotyrosine immonium ion and a cyclophosphoramidate ion.
Ions, Esterification, Molecular Sequence Data, Glutamic Acid, Sensitivity and Specificity, Mass Spectrometry, Peptide Fragments, Protein Structure, Secondary, 1-Butanol, Tandem Mass Spectrometry, Animals, Cattle, Amino Acid Sequence, Asparagine, Chickens, Chromatography, Liquid
Ions, Esterification, Molecular Sequence Data, Glutamic Acid, Sensitivity and Specificity, Mass Spectrometry, Peptide Fragments, Protein Structure, Secondary, 1-Butanol, Tandem Mass Spectrometry, Animals, Cattle, Amino Acid Sequence, Asparagine, Chickens, Chromatography, Liquid
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
