
pmid: 22974699
I read with interest the recently published paper by Greupner et al. ([1][1]), and would like to comment on the surprising absence of contrast echocardiography among the tested methods for volume and ejection fraction measurement. At least 2 previously published studies, which were not
Male, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Echocardiography, Heart Ventricles, Humans, Female, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Ventricular Function, Left
Male, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Echocardiography, Heart Ventricles, Humans, Female, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Ventricular Function, Left
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
