<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
pmid: 21679858
We read with interest the systematic review and meta-analysis reporting on the prognostic value of cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) by Hulten et al. ([1][1]). The authors performed an extensive literature search and pooled 18 studies that reported the incidence of cardiovascular events
EMC NIHES-01-64-03, EMC NIHES-03-30-01, Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Angiography, Prognosis, EMC NIHES-03-30-02, Predictive Value of Tests, Humans, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, EMC COEUR-09
EMC NIHES-01-64-03, EMC NIHES-03-30-01, Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Angiography, Prognosis, EMC NIHES-03-30-02, Predictive Value of Tests, Humans, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, EMC COEUR-09
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 37 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |