<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
pmid: 14522501
The last Editor's Page dealt with the topic of a report card for journals. Just as journals are subject to grading, so are the critiques of manuscripts prepared by reviewers. In fact, the Editors grade each review for quality based on a number of characteristics we have found to be of value. However
Peer Review, Research, Humans, Periodicals as Topic, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Peer Review, Research, Humans, Periodicals as Topic, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 21 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |