
When expressing preferences in qualitative setting, several possible linguistic terms with different weights (represented by probabilities) may be considered at the same time. The probabilistic distribution is usually hard to be provided completely and ignorance may exist. In this paper, we first propose a novel concept called probabilistic linguistic term set (PLTS) to serve as an extension of the existing tools. Then we put forward some basic operational laws and aggregation operators for PLTSs. After that, we develop an extended TOPSIS method and an aggregation-based method respectively for multi-attribute group decision making (MAGDM) with probabilistic linguistic information, and apply them to a practical case concerning strategy initiatives. Finally, the strengths and weaknesses of our methods are clarified by comparing them with some similar techniques.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1K | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.01% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 0.1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.1% |
