Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Archivio della Ricer...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
UCL Discovery
Article . 2016
Data sources: UCL Discovery
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Information and Software Technology
Article . 2016 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
DBLP
Article . 2023
Data sources: DBLP
versions View all 6 versions
addClaim

Web Effort Estimation: Function Point Analysis vs. COSMIC

Authors: Sergio Di Martino; Filomena Ferrucci; Carmine Gravino; Federica Sarro;

Web Effort Estimation: Function Point Analysis vs. COSMIC

Abstract

Context: software development effort estimation is a crucial management task that critically depends on the adopted size measure. Several Functional Size Measurement (FSM) methods have been proposed. COSMIC is considered a 2nd generation FSM method, to differentiate it from Function Point Analysis (FPA) and its variants, considered as 1st generation ones. In the context of Web applications, few investigations have been performed to compare the effectiveness of the two generations. Software companies could benefit from this analysis to evaluate if it is worth to migrate from a 1st generation method to a 2nd one. Objective: the main goal of the paper is to empirically investigate if COSMIC is more effective than FPA for Web effort estimation. Since software companies using FPA cannot build an estimation model based on COSMIC as long as they do not have enough COSMIC data, the second goal of the paper is to investigate if conversion equations can be exploited to support the migration from FPA to COSMIC. Method: two empirical studies have been carried out by employing an industrial data set. The first one compared the effort prediction accuracy obtained with Function Points (FPs) and COSMIC, using two estimation techniques (Simple Linear Regression and Case-Based Reasoning). The second study assessed the effectiveness of a two-step strategy that first exploits a conversion equation to transform historical FPs data into COSMIC, and then builds a new prediction model based on those estimated COSMIC sizes. Results: the first study revealed that, on our data set, COSMIC was significantly more accurate than FPs in estimating the development effort. The second study revealed that the effectiveness of the analyzed two-step process critically depends on the employed conversion equation. Conclusion: for Web effort estimation COSMIC can be significantly more effective than FPA. Nevertheless, additional research must be conducted to identify suitable conversion equations so that the two-step strategy can be effectively employed for a smooth migration from FPA to COSMIC.

Countries
Italy, United Kingdom
Keywords

Web Effort Estimation, COSMIC; Functional Size Measures; IFPUG Function Point Analysis; Web Effort Estimation; Software; Information Systems; Computer Science Applications1707 Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Functional Size measures, IFPUG Function Point Analysis, COSMIC, Software Engineering, Functional Size Measures, Web effort estimation, Functional Size measures, COSMIC, IFPUG Function Point Analysis, Software Engineering, Web effort estimation

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    37
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
37
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Green
bronze