
When fitting contour models to image data, it is necessary to take into account unmodelled shape variability. Traditionally, this has been done either by blurring the input image or by looking for image features in the neighborhood of the contour. A more statistically rigorous approach is to marginalize over all possible shape deformations. When this is done, the resulting likelihood model has similarities to both the blurring approach and the feature-based approach. A tracking application is used to demonstrate the marginalized likelihood model and compare it to the blurring approach. The best tracking results were obtained with the new model when combined with the Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
