
pmid: 24616217
ABSTRACTBackgroundThe purpose of this study was to present our analysis of outcomes, prognostic factors, and treatment for cervical esophageal carcinoma using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.MethodsA query of the SEER database from 1998 to 2008 was performed for patients with nonmetastatic adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the cervical esophagus. Disease‐specific survival (DSS) rates were calculated using Kaplan–Meier method, and predictive factors were analyzed by Cox proportional hazards regression.ResultsWe identified 362 patients; 92% of the patients had SCC, 16% received no definitive therapy, 5% received surgery, 71% received radiation therapy (RT), and 8% received both. Chemotherapy data were not available. Median DSS was 49 months for adenocarcinoma and 15 months for SCC. On multivariate analysis, histology (p = .02), RT (p < .001), and surgery plus RT (p < .001) were associated with DSS.ConclusionSurvival in patients with cervical esophageal carcinoma remains poor. Further studies should define the use of RT, surgery, and chemotherapy. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 37: 808–814, 2015
Adult, Male, Esophageal Neoplasms, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Adenocarcinoma, Middle Aged, Combined Modality Therapy, Disease-Free Survival, Cohort Studies, Esophagectomy, Multivariate Analysis, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Humans, Female, Radiotherapy, Adjuvant, Aged, Follow-Up Studies, Proportional Hazards Models, Retrospective Studies, SEER Program
Adult, Male, Esophageal Neoplasms, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Adenocarcinoma, Middle Aged, Combined Modality Therapy, Disease-Free Survival, Cohort Studies, Esophagectomy, Multivariate Analysis, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Humans, Female, Radiotherapy, Adjuvant, Aged, Follow-Up Studies, Proportional Hazards Models, Retrospective Studies, SEER Program
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 66 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
